The new order is abusive of authority, it is profanation, it is sacrilege. Christ can over-ride their false church, false blessings and sacraments. We hope and pray He does not completely abandon us in the overall structure of the Catholic Church. When we use holy water and go to confession who is it that makes us holy and forgives us? If this is not so at all then we are all damned. I even see that a novus ordo consecration being held in the Tabernacle or for any use for presence in prayer or at the indult is not sufficient for consumption since it has been profaned by the new order. Did I say stop the indult, don't go to the novus ordo services but I caution you in taking profane consecrations of the new order? Even if you are not a member of the masons and you have a free-thinking ideology and are a modernist in material and worldly matters, you are a free-mason and have ignorantly, arrogantly, proudly embraced this false religion and new theology of the church's enemies. Bishops and clergy have tainted all things and only Christ can perform the clean oblation or the pure sacrifices through any of the sacraments or the substances such as the hosts, wine, water or the blessings of religious items, or your house and car.

Then, Jesus added, "My daughter, I desire that you let everybody know the Fifteen Secret Tortures in order that everyone of them be honored." "Anyone who daily offers Me, with love, one of these sufferings and says with fervor the following prayer, will be rewarded with eternal glory on the day of judgement."

Our enemies are inside the post council church. We know who they are and it is them we must attack and for the new order people I mean attack their persons and their evils not their priesthood since all of these we fight are ordained or will be ordained. We want this false church of apostacy destroyed but only God can destroy his enemies inside it. We have different views about the Vatican and the New Order Church and all its slop and crappy leaders of the last 48 some years starting with manifest heretic John XXIII. It is appropriate to call any clergy, bishop, cardinal or pope a manifest and formal heretic because they know doctrine and canon law. There are no excuses to play their evil down. It does not matter if they thought they did right or are not in error. Since the Holy Ghost is not in them they were heretics. Material heresy as a lesser heresy or any other judgments on the false leaders that reduce their culpability are denied by the Heavenly King. These are not laity or outsiders where material heresy is a possibility. We can adjudge these leaders and clergy guilty of the higher heresies they are accused of. It was and is because the evil body of bishops never take counsel against their dirty post conciliar popes or monstrous head of the body of bishops. Does the papal seat being vacant violate Vatican I and scripture? Since 1958 these dirty anti-popes were not the popes visible or these redhats and bishops were not visible to heaven. Surely none of them should have been chosen or consecrated, and if so then formal accusations needed to brought against them. The dogs of the post council new order church did not and will not bring the truth in and hell is their punishment. We know the laity in ignorance and this obedience to these vocations and leaders will not fight them so it is up to us to battle them though we are being ignored. In that the church is not let as orphans it certainly looks like it by the Vatican, at least as far as truth and doctrinal teaching is concerned. But Christ Himself has still left Himself and His teachings for all of us and to follow infallible pre-Vatican II teachings.

I say disobey the "popes" for now on and the bishops when you know they are wrong and disobey the dirty clergy when they are wrong. We must be rebellious towards them since they hold not to pre-Vatican II dogma or scriptures. I have less respect for any new order priest or new order leader of the Church. If you are ordained in the old and you like the new you are a manifest heretic and should be flogged to death. If the clergy and leaders modernize or have false interpretations of scripture listen not, but fight these dogs. They have been stripped of their authority for any scandal, manifest, formal or even material heresy. There are problems with the indult if what comes from the Tabernacle is not consecrated on the altar in the Latin Rite but was contained from a previous new order consecration. Such is the case all the time with novus ordo clergy since they also say the new order services and have loyalty to their bishops and to Rome. If they do not say certain prayers or use certain liturgy from the Tridentine Rite they cheapen the oblation, then is not the sacrifice being made less than what it is? If no sacrifice occurs no Mass occurs. Are the clergy in union with the truth in their sermons to orthodox teaching of the pre-Vatican era and are they dipping their fingers in when necessary? Are they adding their own words or deleting from any of the liturgy or consecration prayers? The indult may suffer from other technical and spiritual defects. I say you should take all you can out of the indult but it is not the answer to all your prayers. It is a step in the right direction. I tell you if you really want to be sure go to the independents who offer everything from tradition and none of us should settle for less. Let us not take part in any profanation, idolatry, papalotry (worship of Pope), sacrilege from those new ordo clergy that offer the Latin Mass. Such may be in receiving Communion since it probably is a new ordo blessing and consecrated. We would not drink poison or eat food or drink wine offered to idols would we? From St. Pius V, "If [the Pope]... gives an order contrary to right customs, he should not be obeyed; if he attempts to do something manifestly opposed to justice and the common good, it will be lawful to resist him." The last saint that lived was one who had a direct contact with Christ. That is St. Padre Pio. Ever since not one can be considered a saint. If there are saints after the death of St. Pio they are unknown and they are not of the Vatican II New Order church or loyal to it. Such a person destined for sainthood can be loyal to Christ but not the post dirty council new order catholic church. The insult indult scanty harvest that the ecclesia dei feels they must be obedient to heretic popes and heretic cardinals, bishops and novus ordo heretic priests. The documents of the anti-pope John Paul and the Ecclesia Dei are heretical, blasphemous, scandalous and even in contradiction to the revised canon law 1983 of heretics. Don't ever sign or agree in word to the new order church in order to attend even the indult Masses. Part of the verbal or written agreement to be a member of the Fraternity is to accept the mark of Vatican II and novus ordo church which is a forewarning for all of us about the sign of the beast. Indultery is a compromise of this agreement in word, deed, email, writing, or even in your beliefs though hidden from anyone, but not from God. Indultery is a wide range of attitudes with nostalgia or just preference over the newvus ordo missal. Indultery is a slave to the Vatican II dictatorship and its agendas.

Heresies of "Pope" Benedict XVI (aka Joseph Ratzinger)
"If anyone holds to one single one of these (heresies) he is not a Catholic." -- Pope Leo XIII (from Encyclical Satis Cognitum:28)

What is Heresy?
“Heresy consists in a stubborn denial of truths which have been defined and proposed by the Church as divinely revealed doctrines.” (Canon 1324-1325 of the 1917 Code of Canon Law).
What must we believe?
“By the divine and Catholic Faith, all those things must be believed which are contained in the written Word of God and in tradition, and those which are proposed by the Church, either in a solemn pronouncement or in her ordinary and universal magisterium, to be believed as divinely revealed.” (Vatican Council I, Denzinger 1792)
Who does not believe all those things taught by the Magisterium of the Church? "Any baptized person who ... obstinately denies or doubts any of the truths proposed for belief by divine and Catholic faith, is a heretic."(C. 1325) Can a heretic be a valid Pope of the Roman Catholic Church? No. The Papal Bull Cum ex apostolatus officio of Pope Paul IV teaches that: if anyone was a heretic before the Papal election, he could not be a valid pope, even if he is elected unanimously by the Cardinals. Canon 188.4 (1917 Code of Canon Law) teachers that: if a cleric (pope, bishop, etc.) becomes a heretic, he loses his office without any declaration by operation of law. St. Robert Bellarmine, St. Antonius, St. Francis deSales, St. Alphonsus Liguori, and many other tehologians all teach that a heretic cannot be a pope: “If however, God were to permit a pope to become a notoriously and contumacious heretic he would by such fact cease to be pope, and the apostolic chair would be vacant.” -- St. Alphonsus Liguori, Church Doctor: Verita bella Fede. Pt. iii, Ch.viii, 9-10.

Heresies of "Pope" Benedict XVI, (aka Joseph Ratzinger) Truth of Divine and Catholic Faith

1. Ratzinger denies the Real Presence...
“Eucharistic devotion such as is noted in the silent visit by the devout in church must not be thought of as a conversation with God. This would assume that God was present there locally and in a confined way. To justify such an assertion shows a lack of understanding of the Christological mysteries of the very concept of God. This is repugnant to the serious thinking of the man who knows about the omnipresence of God. To go to church on the ground that one can visit God who is present there is a senseless act which modern man rightfully rejects.” Source: Die Sacramentale Begrundung Christliche Existenz by Joseph Ratzinger
“If anyone says that after the consecration is complete the body and blood of our Lord Jesus Christ are not in the sacrament of the Eucharist and in the consecrated hosts or particles which are reserved (in the tabernacle) the true body and blood of our Lord remain not, let him be anathema.” Source: Council of Trent, Canon 4, mid-16th century
2. Ratzinger has rejected and ridiculed the core Catholic doctrine of Original Sin in public homilies he delivered in Munich, later published in book form. Source: In the Beginning, Ignatius Press, 1990 The doctrine of original sin is a truth revealed by God in passages of the Old and New Testaments, but especially in the texts of Genesis 3:1-20. Sacred Tradition and the Church Magisterium teach that the sin of the first man is transmitted to all his descendants not through imitation but through propagation.
3. Ratzinger is an Evolutionist, which by definition makes one an athiest. To quote Ratzinger...
...for science has long since disposed of the concepts (Genesis: l-49) that we have just now heard ...we hear of the Big Bang, which happened billions of years ago. ...it was rather in complex ways and over vast periods of time that earth and the universe were constructed. (p.12)
We cannot say: creation or evolution. The proper way of putting it is: creation and evolution. (p.65)
...the progress of thought in the last two decades helps us to grasp anew the inner unity of creation and evolution and of faith and reason. (p.66)
Source: In the Beginning is an annotated version of a 4-homily series delivered by Joseph Ratzinger in Munich (1981). Subtitled A Catholic Understanding of the Story of Creation and the Fall, the book was published in Germany in 1985 and is now available in English translation.
“The first men were Adam and Eve, who were created immediately by God” Source: Catechism of Christian Doctrine, published at the order of Pope St. Pius X 4. Ratzinger favors Ecumenism...

The train that took the false religious leaders from the Vatican to Assisi was described by Ratzinger as “a symbol of our pilgrimage in history... Are we not all, perhaps, passengers on the same train?... Is not the fact that the train chose as its destiny peace and justice, and the reconciliation of peoples and religions, a great inspiration and, at the same time, a splendid sign of hope?” Source: Zenit News Report, Feb. 21, 2002.
“Conventions, meetings and addresses are frequently arranged by these persons, at which a large number of listeners are present, and at which all without distinction are invited to join in the discussion, both infidels of every kind, and Christians, even those who have unhappily fallen away from Christ or who with obstinacy and pertinacity deny His divine nature and mission. Certainly such attempts can nowise be approved by Catholics, founded as they are on that false opinion which considers all religions to be more or less good and praiseworthy ... Not only are those who hold this opinion in error and deceived, but also in distorting the idea of true religion they reject it, and little by little, turn aside to naturalism and atheism, as it is called; from which it clearly follows that one who supports those who holds these theories and attempt to realize them, is altogether abandoning the divinely revealed religion.”
Source: Pope Pius XI, Mortalium Animos (# 2), Jan. 6, 1928 5. Ratzinger does not condemn laxness in Catholics...
“I have nothing against people who, though they never enter a church during the year, go to Christmas Mass, or go on the occasion of some other celebration, because this is also a way of coming close to the light. Therefore, there must be different forms of involvement and participation.” Source:Zenit News interview, Oct. 1, 2001
All those who permit themselves to be lax in the practice of the faith will freeze in spiritual death just as surely as a person who permits himself to sleep poorly clothed in a below zero cold place.
6. Ratzinger rejects the notion that non-Catholics should be converted...
“The new text describes the relationship between the Church and non-Catholic Christians without speaking of 'membership.' By shedding this terminological armor, the text acquired a much wider scope... The Catholic has to recognize that his own Church is not yet prepared to accept the phenomenon of multiplicity in unity; he must orient himself toward this reality… Meantime the Catholic Church has no right to absorb other Churches.”
Source: Joseph Ratzinger, Theological Highlights of Vatican II, New York: Paulist Press, 1966, pp. 61, 68

It is a great consolation to receive correspondence from the four corners of the world. At a slow but regular pace people are joining Our world wide parish...That joining makes them one in the Mystical Body of Christ. What ruptures the Mystical Body of Christ? It is heresy, schism and apostasy. To get back into the Church those persons repent of their break from Christ, they make their profession of faith and receive an absolution that receives them back into the Church with the right to receive the sacraments. Once that has been accomplished the convert goes to confession to receive the absolution that takes away sin. 7. Ratzinger denies the Resurrection of the Body...
“Paul [St. Paul] teaches not the resurrection of physical bodies but of persons...” Source: Joseph Ratzinger, Introduction to Christianity, (republished in 1990 with Ratzinger’s approval), p. 277
“The same most holy Roman Church firmly believes, and firmly declares that nevertheless on the day of judgment all men will be brought together with their bodies before the tribunal of Christ to render an account of their own deeds.” (Denz. 464) Source: Pope Gregory X, Council of Lyons II, 1274, ex cathedra
8. Ratzinger teaches that schismatic sects (e.g., the “Orthodox” sects) have the Church of Christ present in them, even though they reject the Papacy...

"Therefore, the Church of Christ is present and operative also in these Churches, even though they lack full communion with the Catholic Church since they do not accept the Catholic doctrine of the Primacy, which, according to the will of God, the Bishop of Rome objectively has and exercises over the entire Church.” Source: Dominus Iesus #17, by Joseph Ratzinger, approved by bogus "pope" John Paul II, Aug. 6, 2000
"There are other, almost countless, proofs drawn from the most trustworthy witnesses which clearly and openly testify with great faith, exactitude, respect and obedience that all who want to belong to the true and only Church of Christ must honor and obey this Apostolic See and the Roman Pontiff.” Source: Pope Pius IX, Amantissimus (# 3), April 8, 1862
“Finally, in one word, stay close to Us. For no one can be in the Church of Christ without being in unity with its visible head and founded on the See of Peter.” Source: Pope Pius VI, Charitas (# 32), April 13, 1791
“Therefore if a man does not want to be, or to be called, a heretic, ... but let him hasten before all things to be in communion with the Roman See.” Source: Pope Leo XIII, Satis Cognitum (# 13), June 29, 1896

9. Ratzinger holds that the Jews can validly continue to await the coming of the Messiah...
In late 2001, the Pontifical Biblical Commission released a book entitled The Jewish People and the Holy Scriptures in the Christian Bible. This book argues that the Jews’ wait for the Coming of the Messiah is justified and validated by the Old Testament. Ratzinger wrote the preface for the book. So, in doing so, Ratzinger denies that that Jesus Christ is Messiah. “And she shall bring forth a son: and thou shalt call his name Jesus. For he shall save his people from their sins.” Source: Matthew 1:21
"For the Son of man is come to save that which was lost." Source: Matthew 18:11
Heresies of "Pope" Benedict XVI Truth of Divine and Catholic Faith
Link to Holywar.Org for the rest of the site on traditional faith and catholicism.

Presumption for the validity of heretics ordaining or consecrating in the Church has no merit despite the canon law that may seem to indicate different. Canon Law is not above divine law. Nor can there be an excuse that these are extraordinary times. So was the western schism. So were the times of martrydom in the history of the church when no priests or missionaries were able to preach the gospel or give out sacraments due to persecution. Many peoples did not have priests and valid sacraments in the history of the church yet they maintained the faith. Those majority who seek the Mass and empty sacraments from heretics before the faith let them be anathema. No such emergency existed either for Lefebvre and his followers. Only in emergencies may sacraments be conferred such as baptism for one in danger of death or confession and extreme unction. All other cases are void. Once a priest always a priest is a bunch of bull. Excommunicated means they have no priestly functions in the sight of Christ the King. Bishops lose all authority or never had it if they are excommunicated. The SSPX priests ordinations being done by Lefebvre and the bishops he consecrated are null and void. Even if a bishop or one who claims to have the powers of a bishop is a heretic such as Lienart, Lefebvre cannot claim to have jurisdiction of his own. He did claim he had authority but had none. He believed you could be outside the Church and be saved. He was a flip flop filthy dog in doctrine and dogma. Lefebvre is burning in hell for his apostacy, heresy and his other occult sins. No even valid rites and sacraments in the external form can make valid what is declared null and void by Holy Mother Church. Ecclesiastical law even specified by true Popes will not make licit what is not licit and never was and never will be. For those who think they can cite epikeia and Canon Law which is not infallible you need to wake the hell up and that includes all the sedevacantists who think they can attend invalid or illicit Masses, obtain sacraments from heretics and schismatics that lead many into hell. SSPX and the non-sedevacantists lead the way to hell and I call them the mini branch of the Novus Ordo Vatican II Church since they claim to be in communion with apostates and heretics like their "Pope" Benedict. You hypocrites, you tell people not to go to the adulterous indult nor any sedevacantist chapel. I call anti-pope John Paul II a pig and the novus ordo bishops of the world but so is the apostate heretical SSPX who are in communion with new Rome. If you attend the chapels at SSPX you are consuming a piece of bread. They were not sent by the church nor do they have any jurisdiction or authority. First they are in communion or claim to be in communion with apostate Rome and if not they are a schismatic organization and they are tax exempt under 501C. You cannot want to be attached to present Rome and call yourself Catholic. I have read hundreds of pages of the sedevacantist argument from many of the experts and they cannot be refuted. Perhaps Father Gruner also and his deceptions will end. Wake the hell up you heretics! Your not in the Catholic Church. Benedict the anti-pope and the Vatican II sect will never consecrate Russia. They want the schismatic Russian Orthodox to stay where they are.

For quite some time there have been many who claim you must always have the Mass in order for the Church to be visible. They claim that you must have faith and the Mass. But this is wrong. You must have the faith. I cite Hebrews 11:6: It is impossible to please God. Christ had talked about those who had faith in Him. He did not work miracles for the faithless. It does not matter what false trads believe especially the heretics like those at SSPX chapels. They believe lies or refuse to look for the truth so they are condemned. If you teach baptism of desire or blood, invincible ignorance from the Baltimore Catechism you are a HERETIC. You don't love the Catholic Church. If you put the Mass before the faith you don't love the Church. Heretics at the invalid masses at SSPX chapels hide from the truth and deceive themselves and others that they will always have valid or licit sacraments, masses, priests and bishops. Christ has nothing to do with heretics and heretic priests. False and bad advice and information has been given out by even some sedevacantists who claim the 1962 Mass is valid as long as you have a validly ordained priest. It doesn't matter what Quo Primum or the Council of Trent decrees so they will play down apostate anti-popes such as John XXIII and freemasons with their null actions inside the Church just to claim they have valid bishops, priests, masses and sacraments. Well the divine law spits out all of these pathetic people and these abominable less than pure sacraments and prayers. Christ doesn't abide in invalidly ordained priests, heretics and fake bishops that are non-sedevacantists. These are children of the devil. Implicit and or explicit in their heresies. The SSPX clergy are a bunch of dogs and you cannot give them one penny of support. If you go to their null and void masses of the 1962 missal and its rubrics you are in communion with heretics and apostates. You consume a piece of bread. One thing is sure, it is not Jesus Christ you receive. Know it alls that accept the modernized version of the 1962 missal then accept John XXIII and Bugnini and must claim these two freemasons pigs were legitimate authority and Catholic. So to accept the invalid rubrics, sacraments, rites and 1962 Missal is to accept freemasons, modernists and heretics. You have then condemned yourselves by this whether you know or not. None of these bishops that are non-sedevacantists are bishops at all. These are dead and empty sacraments and heretics, apostates and schismatics such as the spiritually dead SSPX majority of lay people who will never go and research the teaching of the Church. No promises have ever been made that we will always have valid Masses or sacraments. Doubtful or invalid sacraments are not sacraments. Attending Masses of heretics and apostates such as the Society of St. Pius X clergy including the invalid Masses of Lefebvre and his void 1988 consecrations and ordinations of priests since he was a notorious heretic and apostate would only condemn these heretics and those who accept and receive the empty sacraments they give you. If you attend and accept Masses and communion from heretics you are a heretic implicitly or explicitly. It is a mortal sin if you don't take the time to research and learn your Catholic faith in order to know and abide by the true orthodox teachings of the Church. No it is not a valid when you attend non-sedevacantists chapels. They cannot cite any authority or jurisdiction, so they cite Aquinas and claim epikeia. But then how can epikeia be claimed if all the heretic bishops and priests of SSPX and non-sedevacantists are in communion with apostates and heretics themselves? In order to claim epikeia you must intend to do what the church does. Doing what heretics and apostates do such as John XXIII and his friend Bugnini is not what the Church does. Get a clue! Now regarding confession. You know all non-sedevacantists are invalid due to their heresies but you can go to confession to a validly ordained traditional priest for confession in the rite established by the Council of Trent. Likewise baptism and extreme unction are licit. Forget Masses, the Eucharist-Communion, Confirmation, Marriage or Holy Orders and please don't go to these non-catholic heretic priests to get things blessed by them. Do not use their holy water either, because it is not holy, it is just water. Regarding the invalidly ordained clergy of the novus ordo, SSPX and non-sedevacantists you would be receiving invalid confessions by going to them. Yet it is Christ who forgives sins so work out your own salvation with fear and trembling. Trust not in these heretics but in Christ. Occult heretical priests are also excommunicated from the Church. Therefore, even if you don't know they are heretics you must now presume these clowns be they validly ordained or not must be rejected. Christ does reject and spit these occult heretics out as well. It is best you stop attending these masses and receiving the sacraments of these dogs also. The SSPX are public, notorious and scandalous heretics and apostates and all those who attend their chapels for Mass and pray in unison with them shall be condemned to hell. The remnant church are those few who keep the faith and accept the fact that attending the chapels, seminaries, homes of heretic bishops and priests will only be punishable by eternal damnation since they are a faithless people or lack the full truth of Holy Church who will never negotiate with heretics. People who attend the SSPX for example are like the dogs that return to their vomit. The SSPX is part of the beast system since they are tax exempt and are part of the new world system. They are in communion with heretics and apostates and if you attend their chapels you also are guilty of being part of the beast system even if you are a sedevacantist. You must abjure from your heresies and that you attended the SSPX. You will not be forgiven unless you abjure and go to a sincere confession by a validly ordained priest. You are not permitted to be under a non-profit organization without being part of the beast system. Incorporation in a political or religious organization is of the beast. It is not what the Church does. Look at what the SSPV publishes and says on their website. Other sources show you why you should not attend chapels where the 1962 missal is said. You need to start researching by the internet, order books and travel to libraries that have large collections of theology so you can check out what others or I say on our websites. We know that these bad willed sedevacantists and non-sedevacantists live in heresies and can be contradicted by what the Councils teach. Many bulls and encyclicals also will refute the deceivers that make up their own rules and like serpents will lie down with heretics in gathering places of false charity and a false catholicism. Praying with heretics makes you a heretic. Heretics are the gates of hell quoting Pope Vigilius. According to one heretic they say they can continue attending these places of deception so if you know of such people you must not associate with them. Warn them one or two times if they listen not, cut them off. Get used to it that even though we have no more valid and licit masses and avoid all heretics that will not be able to destroy the faith of those who are the elect for eternal salvation. You as a true catholic are then a member of the Catholic Church. You cannot accept the revised sacraments of anti-pope John XXIII and Bugnini. You must follow Trent and deviations from it are not licit nor valid since the intention is not there. One of the elements missing nullifies a sacrament. Martin V and Eugene IV spoke fallibly regarding heretics and schismatics that give out valid sacraments. They and the Council of Trent never intended for non-sedevacantists false trads or heretical outfits that are sedevacantists to give out illicit and or invalid sacraments. They are not called by the Church. The Thuc line and the Mendez line must be rejected as heretical and illicit though intentions may be there these men never abjured are excommunicated and can do nothing within the true Church. If there is doubt for any of the sedevacantists sacraments or ordinations you cannot accept them either. We believe there is no chapel to go to or place to receive sacraments anymore. I agree with Richard Ibranyi and a few others on this. You can have externals from sedevacantists outfits but the internal and the divine are not there. Baptism is the only sacrament that can be confected. Christ forgives hopefully through these heretic and apostate clergy in a confession. Extreme Unction by the sedevacantists may not do any good. We hope God will have mercy on these souls and on our souls. We few take the position of St. Athanasius that there the Church exists only in a remnant (people). Not buildings, homes, organizations nor anything else. The SSPX also uses the phony 1962 holy orders for its ordinations. On February 28, 1962 the rite of holy orders was changed by John XXIII and his freemason comrade Bugnini, so it means that an ordained priest is not a true priest or it is doubtful. Compare the ritual and words of holy orders to the decree of Trent. But even if form and matter may seem proper what about the intention substance)... They use other orders and "sacraments" according to Vatican II and the novus ordo. So that tells you if you accept their phony rites, phony bishops, phony priests and "sacraments" you will go to hell.